| Merlin James’s painting has both anticipated
and influenced certain cryptic, antiheroic trends in much current
painting. However, his work is set apart, partly by its highly evolved
formal and pictorial concerns and its complex
relationship to tradition and innovation. He engages the viewer
with varying degrees of representation and comprehensibility; diversity
of structure,
texture, color, and painterly handwriting; play with convention;
evocation of mood; control of association and allusion. The borderlines
of what we can recognize in (and what we can recognize as) one of
his paintings, is
continually tested. Artist's intention and viewer's interpretation
are repeatedly put into question, in works which nonetheless hazard
meaning, beauty, and an account of human experience of the world.
“I am usually irritated by debates about whether painting
in general is alive or dead. But it’s true, in the later decades
of the last century a lot of what was offered as new painting felt
very stale. When it did look more lively it was often animating
the limbs of a cadaver in a puppet-like dance of death.
Why is so much painting either academic or parodic? No doubt
something truly new in art can only come as part of a more general
shift of culture and consciousness. Perhaps by trying to make good
paintings I’m doing my bit for the revolution. Anyway, I try
to make new meaning.”
— Merlin James
Selected solo exhibitions: 2003: Art Gallery, Wolverhampton,
England; Andrew Mummery, London; Kerlin, Dublin; Talbot Rice, Edinburgh;
2002: Brent Sikkema, New York; Kerlin, Dublin; 2001: Andrew Mummery,
London; Yves Hoffmann, Paris.
Selected group exhibitions: 2003: Dirty Pictures,
The Approach, London; Yes! I am a long way from home, Art Gallery,
Wolverhampton; 2002: Saatchi, London; 2000: Stephen Lacey, London;
The Nunnery, London; Andrew Mummery, London; Brent Sikkema, New York;
Velan Centre for Contemporary Art, Turin; Painters Painting, The Approach,
London.
|